OFFLINE TOOL / LINE BALANCING V1.3
PRODUCTION / 023OFFLINE

Line balancing and Yamazumi chart

Tasks with times and precedence stacked per station against takt, line efficiency, balance delay and smoothness, and a station proposal by ranked positional weight.

Input

Takt comes from the takt time calculator (available time / demand). The proposal fills each station up to takt, respecting the predecessors.

Paste, open a CSV, TSV, TXT or XLSX file (up to 20 MB), or drop it on the field. Files are read in this browser only.

Columns

Found by the header names. Station, Predecessors and Category are optional and may be empty in a row.

Task    Time (s)  Station   Predecessors  Category
Base    18        S1                      VA
Switch  14        S1        Base          VA
Long format
1 row = 1 task

Columns: tab, ; or ,
Decimals: 12,5 or 12.5

Paste measurements to start.

One row per task: name and time in seconds; the station it is done at (stations are ordered as they first appear); the tasks that must be finished before it, separated by commas; and VA (value added), NVA (necessary but not value adding) or Waste.

Runs in this browser. Data is not uploaded or stored.

Results

—Line efficiency
—Minimum stations
—Stations now
—Proposal

    How line balancing works

    Line balancing shares the tasks of an assembly line between stations so that every station finishes within takt and the stations are loaded as evenly as possible. Each idle second at a station is paid for on every unit; each second over takt is lost output. The Yamazumi chart stacks the tasks of each station so both show at once.

    Measures

    The proposal

    Worked example (the tool's example)

    1. Twelve tasks of a coffee grinder assembly take Σt = 252 s. With a takt of 60 s at least ⌈252 / 60⌉ = ⌈4.2⌉ = 5 stations are needed.
    2. As entered, the five stations take 44, 56, 62, 58 and 32 s. Station S3 (wire motor, hopper, connect: 62 s) is over takt. Line efficiency = 252 / (5 × 62) = 81.3 %, balance delay 18.7 %, smoothness index √(18² + 6² + 0² + 4² + 30²) = 35.7.
    3. The ranked positional weight proposal also uses 5 stations: 50, 50, 50, 58 and 44 s (base and motor; wire motor and burrs; switch, connect and hopper; housing and test; label, pack and fetch parts). The longest is 58 s, within takt: line efficiency = 252 / (5 × 58) = 86.9 %.
    4. The chart also shows that “Fetch parts” (12 s) is waste and test, label and pack (62 s) are necessary but add no value: moving parts closer removes a block instead of moving it.

    Common mistakes

    Input and files

    Questions

    What is a Yamazumi chart?
    A stacked bar chart with one column per station (or operator) in which each block is one task, drawn to its time. Yamazumi is Japanese for “piled up”. With the takt line across it, it shows at a glance which stations are overloaded, which have idle time and how much of the work adds value.
    What is a good line efficiency?
    It depends on how finely the work can be split; 85 to 95 % is common for a manual assembly line. Efficiency is measured against the longest station, so a line can be well balanced and still too slow: check the longest station against takt as well.
    Does the ranked positional weight method find the best balance?
    Not always. It is a heuristic: it usually gets close to the minimum number of stations but does not guarantee it, and it ignores zoning, reach, tools and operator skills. Treat its result as a proposal to check and adjust on the line.
    What if one task is longer than takt?
    No assignment of whole tasks can meet takt. Split the task, run two stations in parallel for it, speed it up, or increase the available time. The proposal is not made until every task fits takt.