MANUFACTURING / INTEGRATION / AUTOMATION
LIVE TOOL

Layered process audit (LPA)

Layers with their frequency, questions per layer, yes / no / N/A with a countermeasure for every “no”, compliance per audit and a completion matrix; one project with the 5S audit.

Example project · Illustrative data: an imaginary assembly cell, not from a real plant or person. The questions are FactoKit’s own example wording, not an official checklist: edit them for your site. The 5S and LPA pages share this project.

The 5S audit of the same project: 5S page.

Result

—Compliance of this audit
—LPA audits
—“No” without countermeasure
—Open actions

The layered process audit needs JavaScript in this browser.

Download offline versionSingle HTML file · v1.4 · 559 KB · works without internet

Blank template to print or fill in your own program

How the layered process audit works

In a layered process audit several layers of the organisation check the same process at their own frequency, with short yes / no questions, and every “no” gets a countermeasure at once. LPA is a common practice (often asked for by customers), not a standard here: the layers, frequencies and questions are FactoKit’s example, to be replaced by your own.

Formulas

Worked example (the tool’s example)

  1. Three layers: team leader daily, supervisor weekly, plant manager monthly; eight questions, two of them only for the higher layers.
  2. The team leader’s audit of 28 September: five yes, one no (a torque tool past its calibration date, with its countermeasure): compliance 5 / 6 = 83 %.
  3. Up to the latest audit on 2 October the team leader audited on 4 of the last 8 days, the supervisor in 1 of the last 8 weeks and the manager in 1 of the last 8 months: the matrix shows where the rhythm is missing.

Common mistakes

Files

Questions

What is a layered process audit?
Short, frequent audits of the same process by several layers of the organisation: for example a team leader every day, a supervisor every week, a manager every month. Each checks that the process is run as defined, and each “no” is acted on at once. The value is in the frequency and in the management attention, not in the score.
How is compliance calculated?
Yes divided by yes plus no, for the questions the audit asked. N/A and unanswered questions are left out. A “no” without a countermeasure is listed separately, because an LPA without a reaction to its findings misses its purpose.
What does the completion matrix show?
For each layer the last eight periods of its frequency (days, ISO weeks or months) up to the latest audit, with a mark where at least one audit was done. It shows whether the layers keep their rhythm; a missing period is a finding of its own.
Are these the official LPA questions?
No. Customer-specific requirements and plants define their own; the questions here are FactoKit’s own example wording, to be replaced by the checks that matter in your process (work instructions, first-part checks, error-proofing, reaction plans).